Analytical Validity
For DNA-based tests, analytical validity requires establishing the
probability that a test will be positive when a particular sequence (analyte) is
present (analytical sensitivity) and the probability that the test will be
negative when the sequence is absent (analytical specificity). Another measure
of analytical validity is reliability, or the probability of repeatedly getting
the same result. In validating a new test analytically, the laboratory
techniques should be as similar as possible to those used when the test will be
performed clinically once it is validated. Analytical sensitivity and
specificity of a genetic test must be determined before it is made available in
clinical practice.
Clinical Validity
Clinical validation involves establishing several measures of clinical
performance including 1) the probability that the test will be positive in
people with the disease (clinical sensitivity), 2) the probability that the test
will be negative in people without the disease (clinical specificity), and 3)
the probability that people with positive test results will get the disease
(positive predictive value, PPV) and that people with negative results will not
get the disease (negative predictive value). Predictive value depends on the
prevalence of the disease in the group or population being studied, as well as
on the clinical sensitivity and specificity of the test. Data on a particular
intended use of a test is needed before that use becomes generally accepted
clinical practice.
Two intrinsic features of genetic diseases affect clinical validity:
Clinical Utility
To improve the benefits of testing, efforts must be made as
tests are developed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of new
interventions. In the absence of such interventions, studies must be mounted to
ensure that testing is beneficial and, particularly, does not inflict
psychological harm. The effect of testing on people with negative, as well as
positive results, is important to assess. The scientists and laboratories
developing genetic tests might not have the expertise to explore a number of
issues related to communication and counseling. Collaboration with clinical
geneticists, genetic counselors, and psychologists can improve the quality of
studies looking into these aspects of test development. Before a genetic test
can be generally accepted in clinical practice, data must be collected to
demonstrate the benefits and risks that accrue from both positive and negative
results.